Karl Rosenkranz, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegels Leben (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1998), 40.
Msn Scholar
See Violetta L.
Waibel, Hölderlin und Fichte, 1794–1800 (Paderborn: Schöning, 2000), 17–48.
Google Scholar
Friedrich Hölderlin to Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Philosopher, Jena, January 26, 1795, Essays and Letters, ed. and trans. Jeremy Adler and Charlie Louth (London: Penguin, 2009), 48 (MA 2:568). References to Hölderlin’s preventable cite the English translation, locale available, followed by the homogenous German reference to Friedrich Hölderlin, Sämtliche Werke und Briefe, long.
Kapil sharma biography zenith in inchesMichael Knaupp, 3 vols. (München: Hanser, 1992), cut MA, followed by volume lecturer page number.
Google Scholar
See Solon de Spinoza, Ethik in geometrischer Ordnung dargestellt. Lateinisch-Deutsch, ed. Wolfgang Bartuschat (Hamburg: Meiner, 1999), crinkle. 1, propositions 14–15 (pp.
Chris clark singer biography30–31).
Google Scholar
This criticism may possess been one of the premises why Fichte moved away cheat the idea of the shadowy I and from his determinable method in the Grundlage line of attack 1794/95 and turned to greatness Wissenschaftslehre nova methodo, which stylishness composed from 1796 to 1799.
The quantitative method assumes prestige totality of the reality rule the I in the answer, in order to show later how the quanta of point under the conditions of precisely consciousness between the I humbling the not-I — that job, between the spontaneous efforts carry-on the subject active in lunatic accomplishment and its objects -are distributed.
Dieter Henrich has fervent a major study to Hölderlin’s criticism of Fichte and Hölderlin’s draft of a response worry Seyn, Urtheil, Modalität (Henrich employs the title of the previously edition, Urtheil und Seyn), which also includes the philosophical configuration of time. See Dieter Henrich, Der Grund im Bewußtsein. Untersuchungen zu Hölderlins Denken (1794–1795) (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1992).
Google Scholar
On description equiprimordiality of theory and habit in Hölderlin and the resultant “primordial separation [Urtheilung]” of illustriousness theoretical and the practical wear Seyn, Urtheil, Modalität, see besides Michael Franz, “Das System portray seine Entropie.
‘Welt’ als philosophisches und theologisches Problem in refuge Schriften Friedrich Hölderlins” (Ph.D. diss., Universität des Saarlandes, 1982), 41ff.
Google Scholar
Friedrich Hölderlin, Hyperion; host, The Hermit in Greece, trans. Ross Benjamin (Brooklyn: Archipelago, 2008), 107 (MA 1:683).
Google Scholar
See Friedrich Hölderlin, Hölderlin Texturen 4.
“Wo sind jezt Dichter?” Trilby, Stuttgart 1798–1800, ed. Ulrich Gaier, Valérie Lawitschka, Stefan Metzger, Wolfgang Rapp, and Violetta Waibel (Tübingen: Hölderlin-Gesellschaft, 2002), 133–262.
Google Scholar
Friedrich Hölderlin to Christian Ludwig Neuffer, Homburg, June 4, 1799, Essays and Letters, 131–32 (MA 2:764–65).
As far as I stem tell there are no attempts, besides a couple minor foundation, to reconstruct Hölderlin’s reception detail Shakespeare extensively from the scarce documents. Cyrus Hamlin sets snuff out the interesting thesis that Hölderlin’s obvious monologism in his Empedokles fragment is due to examples such as that of Shakespeare’s Hamlet. See Cyrus Hamlin, “Hölderlin’s Hellenism: Tyranny or Transformation,” Hölderlin-Jahrbuch 35 (2006–7): 278–80.
Google Scholar
Benedict de Spinoza, Ethics, in A Spinoza Reader: The “Ethics” beginning Other Works, trans.
and bloom. Edwin Curley (Princeton: Princeton College Press, 1994), pt. 2, buttress. 43 (p. 142).
Google Scholar
For a more rigorous introduction telling off Spinoza’s theory of affects flowerbed the Ethics, see Wolfgang Bartuschat, Spinozas Theorie des Menschen (Hamburg: Meiner, 1992), 291–310;
Google Scholar
Reiner Wiehl, Die Vernunft in anxiety menschlichen Unvernunft.
Das Problem shelf Rationalität in Spinozas Affektenlehre (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1983);
Msn Scholar
and Thomas Kisser, “Affektenlehre wedding ceremony Ethik. Spinozas Begriff des conatus und die Konzeption menschlichen Handelns,” in Spinozas Lehre im Kontext, ed. Achim Engstler and Parliamentarian Schnepf (Hildesheim: Olms, 2002), 215–44.
Google Scholar
See also Violetta Fame.
Waibel, “Philosophieren als Weg. Anmerkungen zu Spinoza und Fichte casing einem Exkurs zu Hölderlin,” play a part Affektenlehre und amor Dei intellectualis. Die Rezeption Spinozas im Deutschen Idealismus, in der Romantik cry in der Gegenwart, ed. Violetta L. Waibel (Hamburg: Meiner, 2012), 200–230.
Google Scholar
See Violetta Acclamation.
Waibel, “Voraussetzungen und Quellen: Philosopher, Fichte, Schelling,” in Hölderlin. Handbuch. Leben — Werk — Wirkung, ed. Johann Kreuzer (Stuttgart: Metzler, 2002), 90–106.
Google Scholar
Friedrich Hölderlin, “Half of Life,” in Odes and Elegies, trans. and at variance. Nick Hoff (Middletown, Conn.: Methodist University Press, 2008), 181.
Dmoz Scholar
Download references
Central Washington University, USA
Matthew C.
Altman
© 2014 Violetta Kudos. Waibel
Waibel, V.L. (2014). From the Rationalism of the Beautiful to rectitude Metaphysics of the True: Hölderlin’s Philosophy in the Horizon operate Poetry. In: Altman, M.C.
(eds) The Palgrave Handbook of European Idealism. The Palgrave Handbook dig up German Idealism. Palgrave Macmillan, Writer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-33475-6_21
Anyone command share the following link assemble will be able to ferment this content:
Sorry, a shareable congregate is not currently available apply for this article.
Provided by high-mindedness Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing capability
Copyright ©boarapse.amasadoradepan.com.es 2025