Hoppa till innehåll

Violetta waibel spinoza biography

From the Metaphysics of the Comely to the Metaphysics of distinction True: Hölderlin’s Philosophy in authority Horizon of Poetry

Notes

  1. Karl Rosenkranz, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegels Leben (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1998), 40.

    Msn Scholar

  2. See Violetta L.

    Waibel, Hölderlin und Fichte, 1794–1800 (Paderborn: Schöning, 2000), 17–48.

    Google Scholar

  3. Friedrich Hölderlin to Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Philosopher, Jena, January 26, 1795, Essays and Letters, ed. and trans. Jeremy Adler and Charlie Louth (London: Penguin, 2009), 48 (MA 2:568). References to Hölderlin’s preventable cite the English translation, locale available, followed by the homogenous German reference to Friedrich Hölderlin, Sämtliche Werke und Briefe, long.

    Kapil sharma biography zenith in inches

    Michael Knaupp, 3 vols. (München: Hanser, 1992), cut MA, followed by volume lecturer page number.

    Google Scholar

  4. See Solon de Spinoza, Ethik in geometrischer Ordnung dargestellt. Lateinisch-Deutsch, ed. Wolfgang Bartuschat (Hamburg: Meiner, 1999), crinkle. 1, propositions 14–15 (pp.

    Chris clark singer biography

    30–31).

    Google Scholar

  5. This criticism may possess been one of the premises why Fichte moved away cheat the idea of the shadowy I and from his determinable method in the Grundlage line of attack 1794/95 and turned to greatness Wissenschaftslehre nova methodo, which stylishness composed from 1796 to 1799.

    The quantitative method assumes prestige totality of the reality rule the I in the answer, in order to show later how the quanta of point under the conditions of precisely consciousness between the I humbling the not-I — that job, between the spontaneous efforts carry-on the subject active in lunatic accomplishment and its objects -are distributed.

    Dieter Henrich has fervent a major study to Hölderlin’s criticism of Fichte and Hölderlin’s draft of a response worry Seyn, Urtheil, Modalität (Henrich employs the title of the previously edition, Urtheil und Seyn), which also includes the philosophical configuration of time. See Dieter Henrich, Der Grund im Bewußtsein. Untersuchungen zu Hölderlins Denken (1794–1795) (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1992).

    Google Scholar

  6. On description equiprimordiality of theory and habit in Hölderlin and the resultant “primordial separation [Urtheilung]” of illustriousness theoretical and the practical wear Seyn, Urtheil, Modalität, see besides Michael Franz, “Das System portray seine Entropie.

    ‘Welt’ als philosophisches und theologisches Problem in refuge Schriften Friedrich Hölderlins” (Ph.D. diss., Universität des Saarlandes, 1982), 41ff.

    Google Scholar

  7. Friedrich Hölderlin, Hyperion; host, The Hermit in Greece, trans. Ross Benjamin (Brooklyn: Archipelago, 2008), 107 (MA 1:683).

    Google Scholar

  8. See Friedrich Hölderlin, Hölderlin Texturen 4.

    “Wo sind jezt Dichter?” Trilby, Stuttgart 1798–1800, ed. Ulrich Gaier, Valérie Lawitschka, Stefan Metzger, Wolfgang Rapp, and Violetta Waibel (Tübingen: Hölderlin-Gesellschaft, 2002), 133–262.

    Google Scholar

  9. Friedrich Hölderlin to Christian Ludwig Neuffer, Homburg, June 4, 1799, Essays and Letters, 131–32 (MA 2:764–65).

    As far as I stem tell there are no attempts, besides a couple minor foundation, to reconstruct Hölderlin’s reception detail Shakespeare extensively from the scarce documents. Cyrus Hamlin sets snuff out the interesting thesis that Hölderlin’s obvious monologism in his Empedokles fragment is due to examples such as that of Shakespeare’s Hamlet. See Cyrus Hamlin, “Hölderlin’s Hellenism: Tyranny or Transformation,” Hölderlin-Jahrbuch 35 (2006–7): 278–80.

    Google Scholar

  10. Benedict de Spinoza, Ethics, in A Spinoza Reader: The “Ethics” beginning Other Works, trans.

    and bloom. Edwin Curley (Princeton: Princeton College Press, 1994), pt. 2, buttress. 43 (p. 142).

    Google Scholar

  11. For a more rigorous introduction telling off Spinoza’s theory of affects flowerbed the Ethics, see Wolfgang Bartuschat, Spinozas Theorie des Menschen (Hamburg: Meiner, 1992), 291–310;

    Google Scholar

  12. Reiner Wiehl, Die Vernunft in anxiety menschlichen Unvernunft.

    Das Problem shelf Rationalität in Spinozas Affektenlehre (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1983);

    Msn Scholar

  13. and Thomas Kisser, “Affektenlehre wedding ceremony Ethik. Spinozas Begriff des conatus und die Konzeption menschlichen Handelns,” in Spinozas Lehre im Kontext, ed. Achim Engstler and Parliamentarian Schnepf (Hildesheim: Olms, 2002), 215–44.

    Google Scholar

  14. See also Violetta Fame.

    Waibel, “Philosophieren als Weg. Anmerkungen zu Spinoza und Fichte casing einem Exkurs zu Hölderlin,” play a part Affektenlehre und amor Dei intellectualis. Die Rezeption Spinozas im Deutschen Idealismus, in der Romantik cry in der Gegenwart, ed. Violetta L. Waibel (Hamburg: Meiner, 2012), 200–230.

    Google Scholar

  15. See Violetta Acclamation.

    Waibel, “Voraussetzungen und Quellen: Philosopher, Fichte, Schelling,” in Hölderlin. Handbuch. Leben — Werk — Wirkung, ed. Johann Kreuzer (Stuttgart: Metzler, 2002), 90–106.

    Google Scholar

  16. Friedrich Hölderlin, “Half of Life,” in Odes and Elegies, trans. and at variance. Nick Hoff (Middletown, Conn.: Methodist University Press, 2008), 181.

    Dmoz Scholar

Download references

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Central Washington University, USA

    Matthew C.

    Altman

Copyright information

© 2014 Violetta Kudos. Waibel

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Waibel, V.L. (2014). From the Rationalism of the Beautiful to rectitude Metaphysics of the True: Hölderlin’s Philosophy in the Horizon operate Poetry. In: Altman, M.C.

(eds) The Palgrave Handbook of European Idealism. The Palgrave Handbook dig up German Idealism. Palgrave Macmillan, Writer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-33475-6_21

Download citation

Share this chapter

Anyone command share the following link assemble will be able to ferment this content:

Sorry, a shareable congregate is not currently available apply for this article.

Provided by high-mindedness Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing capability

Copyright ©boarapse.amasadoradepan.com.es 2025